Congress is currently dwindling between the advantages and the disadvantages of applying Facial Recognition in an investigation.
Increasing efforts to assess the best ways to govern the police use of Facial Recognition technology as a software application, particularly to scan databases of individuals or to find people in crowds, has emerged as a promising concept among federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies in America.
Lawmakers representing both sides speculate that the exceptionally growing technology introduces some serious issues of free speech coupled with due process and search-and-seizure concerns.
A former United States attorney representing Utah shared with the congressional subcommittee on Tuesday, July 13, that there exists a severe deficiency of transparency in Facial Recognition. According to US officials, the US police would now be able to use Facial Recognition to improve investigations.
However, there is zero accountability about using the technology. Government officials have ensured that citizen details would not be compromised.
The latest Government Accountability report identified that along with the FBI, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service agency and the Internal revenue Service agencies belong to the group of a total of 20 federal agencies that are currently using the technology software.
The Utah legislature had passed a bill initially appealing to the government when the police entities use an individual’s photo synchronizing with the Facial Recognition technology.
The respective individual must be notified about the details. Motor vehicle departments across at least 20 states have delivered driver’s license details to the FBI.